Recently we had a vicious but interesting debate in the stubfartosphere about the Gun Thing. All the usual suspects were at the cyber-mall food court, dressed in Velcro shoes and squishy depends diapers. The issue: in the US, open carry of firearms is legal. And it seems that a few of our guys had their milk curdle on them when some derpsters passed through the food court - with AR’s slung over their backs. The curmudgeons were all incensed! “The optics of that are horrible!! Non-gun people will see that and demand stricter gun controls!! There’s no need for that!!! How are we going to win Suzy Subaru and Sally Soccer Mom over to our side of the gun debate if morons are gonna run around in public with assault rifles slung like that!?!?” The issue came up again in the 2A demonstration in Virginia on Monday when some men showed up, armed with guns and ready to use them if necessary.
I looked up from my lumpy, dismal glass of Orange Metamucil and politely said, “Oh, stuff it, you stupid old women! They are within their rights, they haven’t broken any laws, so shut your gobs and mind your own beeswax!”
And then the food fight was on. Elderly geezers chimped out in every direction, and all started cursing and swearing at once! Aesop threw a bottle of viagra at me in a rage. I gave him the frowning of his life, and Borepatch fibrillated and started to go into cardiac arrest. Mall security showed up and we were all gently but firmly rolled out the door by smirking mall cops. Fuggin kids!!!🤬🤬🤬😡
One of the mistakes that old farts like BP and Aesop make in the gun control debate is classic. For years i made that same mistake myself. I come from a family of shitlibs - so you can probably guess where they stood on guns. When we fought about it in my family, I always lost. I didn’t get it. I memorized facts and figures. My stats in my arguments came right from law enforcement agencies like the RCMP and the FBI. They were a matter of public record. But still, every time we talked about it... I lost. I thought that maybe it was my delivery? I thought that if I could just present the facts the right way, that these progs and liberals might see things in a differently. But, whatever I tried, it was to no avail. The only way to less crime are gun bans!!
The Z Man has an excellent synopsis of the gun debate here.
The fact is that the heart and soul of the anti gun movement are emotional white shitlib women. Women like Sally Soccer Mom, and Susie Subaru. They dominate their men because they are smarter than they are, and fighting with them is a waste of time. Sally Soccer Mom thinks with her emotions. Her personal priority in life is to nurture and hone them. She gets up in the morning and gets the family going. She drives the kids to school in a minican and drops them off. Then she goes to yoga class to feed her spirituality. Afterwards, she dips into Starbucks to chatter with the coffee klatch and gossip with the girls. She gets her info from Slate, the Huffington Post, The View, Vox, and other progressive liberal sources. At the end of the day she checks in with her children to make sure they learned their lessons, and that they think and play the right way. She’s confidently assured by the pozzed media that she is powerful, independent and wise. She’s assured that things like race, sexuality, morals and ethics ... are all relative and can be whatever she thinks they should be, as long as they make her feel good. She’s told that toxic masculinity is the cause of all evil in society, and the only way to control bad men is with good govt. She believes that it is perfectly logical for a retarded 16 year old schoolgirl to lecture and scold a US President about the environment. If you present her a choice between security or freedom, she will pick security every time, regardless of cost. Where do you think such women will fall on the realities of issues like gun control and crime?
And men like Aesop and Borepatch think they will change the minds of these women? Good luck with that boys!😆👍
My experience is that it doesn’t matter how well you present your facts or frame your viewpoints to these women and their cucked men. They will not be swayed by courtesy, reason, or anger and bombast. They are smarter than you are (they are DEFINITELY smarter than any man!) and to them, Greta Thunberg, Orca Winfrey, Whoopi Goldberg, AOC and Hillary Clinton are edgy intellectuals.
Old world men are chivalrous and fair. They were brought up that way, and were expected to respect reason and truth. If you place him in an argument with a modern progressive woman, he will lose every time. The realities of complex issues like gun control offend such women. Because they are led by their emotions they will never be convinced to respect the virtues of an armed citizenry. Left unchecked, they will bring the roof down on themselves and their men too.
My experience with them is that not only arguing with them is a waste of time, but so is appeasing them. If anyone wants to change my mind, feel free to have at it in the comments.
Thanks for dropping in and have a great day.