Filthie's Mobile Fortress Of Solitude

Filthie's Mobile Fortress Of Solitude
Where Great Intelligence Goes To Be Insulted

Wednesday, 12 October 2022

Et Tu, Tulsi…?

 I dunno what to make of that chick. I want to like her, but she’s out to lunch about abortion, guns, and welfare. Being Canadian I don’t know much about her… except that she bailed on the Donks and was probably right to do so. A lot more people need to do that for exactly the same reasons.

She’s definitely different from the average Donk women, who seem to have gone collectively batshit crazy. There was that fake indian, the fake black chick, the screaming pink pussy hatters, the cackling shrews like Kamela and Hillary that couldn’t tell the truth if their lives depended on it… Barkie Obutthole’s she-boon needed a birch-slapping as much as any of them… 

Which is not to say I agree with her or would vote for her. But she isn’t an open blatant insult to the eye or the intelligence  that so many of the liberal political women are. Could she be the pebble that goes skittering down the slope ahead of the avalanche?

28 comments:

  1. Might be given the number of Never Tulsi posters that suddenly popped up on every right wing site.

    Something about her scared the Democraps. So, they sent their attack pundits even the secondary barking dogs that bark because everybody else is barking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. She's a "Commie lite". Not as far left as most Demonrats but still a threat to freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. considering the extent ad depth of convoluted evil which is par among these people, it may be that some conservatives may take her to their bosoms, wherein, like the storied snake, she may bite them.
    do not trust her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As I said the barking dogs of commentary.

    ReplyDelete
  5. News flash NO Professional Politician is trustworthy. They get into a slimy swamp for power and money.

    Republican or Democrap they are two wings on the same carrion bird eating at the body of our near dead Republic.

    The sword of Damocles and term limits is our best bet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. She's also one of Klaus (eat the bugs) Schwab's " Young Global Leaders". Snake in the grass.

    ReplyDelete
  7. All you need to know is she is eminently fuckable. Who cares what she thinks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HAR HAR HAR!!!

      The one problem liberals can't handle is the negation of the sexual contract. As our divorce stats attest - promiscuity and sexual freedom/equality just leads to misery. Men go to the poor house in a divorce... but women often end up in the nut house. In today's world, if you screw it... you still own it, and everything that comes of it afterward. Given what's going on in that woman's head, I have no interest in what goes on in her pants.

      She's all yours - and best of luck to you on that!

      Delete
    2. A simple "don't stick it in crazy" would suffice. ;)
      Steve S6

      Delete
    3. Aye. Thank you, Steve! 👍

      Delete
  8. On the plus side--she looks good in a bikini and surfs quite well.

    ReplyDelete
  9. She's easy on the eyes and not batshit crazy. That's what sets her apart. Other than that she's a garden variety old-style democrat. Her shanking Kamala Harris on the debate stage was epic.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Could any of the above well spoke computer literate folks SHOW me Tulsi's voting record for the past two years?

    Or are we simply barking dogs, barking something someone else said before?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That might be interesting. Are you suggesting that she has a place among conservative/centrist voters, Michael?

      Delete
    2. Are you a troll, lazy, or just plain dumb? There are no voting records for her for the last 2 years, because she left office in January, 2021. But, if you were truly interested in finding her voting records, they are readily available on the internet.
      She is for gun control, open borders, and many other things that true conservatives oppose.
      She does show herself to be a moderate on some issues that appeal to conservatives, but not enough to want to vote for her.

      Delete
    3. Well at least somebody knew something factual about Tulsi instead of pure barking dogs' complaints.

      Kudos to anonymous.

      So why is someone not in office (Meaning NOT a career politician) is drawing so much ire and fire from the Professional Politicians?

      Pretty odd.

      I do think from meeting up with her personally that she indeed is a centralist person to run for office IF she can get past the Democratic National Party machine.

      Or perhaps like Ralf Nader a theif of voters from either the Dems or the Repugs.

      Delete
    4. As I stated above, she is a moderate on many issues that would allow her to probably get votes from Republicans, as well as moderate Democrats. In all fairness, she would probably be a better representative than many of the RINOs that are currently in office. However, she doesn't support the issues that are of major importance to me, like gun rights, and secure borders being two big issues.

      Delete
  11. I want to give her the benefit of the doubt, grew up demonrat so she had to shake off a lot of baggage. WEF? My guess is she attended and said wtf, not for me.
    But hey like the poster above said, she is a politician so...trust ( a little maybe ) but verify, verify, verify.
    Tom Luongo has a good post on her, with his thoughts. Tom has very good track record calling out the BS in general, so worth a look.
    https://tomluongo.me/2022/10/11/whos-afraid-of-tulsi-gabbard-everyone/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey thanks for the link Pat. I will check him out...

      Delete
    2. Wowsa! That Luongo link is dyn-o-mite! Thanks for the reference; I've printed it out to read again after I shut down my internet addiction for the day. It goes far, far beyond the issue of one minor politician, and I'm going to be looking for his name further on.

      Delete
  12. She's a globalist whore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got links to show proof of your comment? While you're at it can you comment (since you're so well informed) WHO in the Political world isn't a "Globalist Whore"?

      Delete
  13. Once a quisling always a quisling. Can't change the spots on a leopard.
    Oh, and Wikipedia seems to like her; that's not a conservative endorsement.
    Steve S6

    ReplyDelete
  14. Steve I put the same question to you as the anonymous above. Show links of her "Quisling" status.

    BTW from Aesop's posters anybody that doesn't hate Putin is a Quisling. Would you like me to snip and post them for you?

    ReplyDelete
  15. She's exactly what she says she is -- a classic liberal. She would have been perfectly at home in the Democrat Party of 1980, but as she said, the Democrat Party has moved away from liberalism into Progressivism, which is a different thing-- a radical Stalinist populism.

    What's happening in the Democratic Party is almost the same thing as what's happening in the Republican Party, and is why the "Never Trumpers" are leaving. She's the Democrat equivalent of a Never Trumper.

    If you think back to the days of the cold war, there has always been a power struggle between national/populist/libertarian-leaning Republicans and "establishment" Republicans. Back in the day, for instance, they were "Goldwater" Republicans versus "Rockefeller" Republicans. Now they are "MAGA Republicans" and "Never Trumpers," but it's the same dynamic. For the past 40 years, the Rockefeller Republicans have largely held the advantage, with the exception of the Reagan years. The Never Trumpers are not really "RINOs." they are just classic Rockefeller Republicans -- slightly right of center establismentarians.

    Tulsi Gabard is the Democrat equivalent of the Rockefeller Republican. She has largely liberal but not antiestablishment values. She would have felt perfectly at home reaching compromises with a Bush (either one) administration during a period where establishment Democrats vied with establishment Republicans over relatively minor changes in American governance. You see the same sort of thing with Harold Ford Jr. The difference is that these establishment Democrats are not so consumed by hatred for their more populist colleagues that they are willing to throw away their ethics and betray their stated core beliefs to fuel their hatred. In contrast to Gabard, the Never Trumpers are willing to jettison the "right of center" part in order to cling to their establishmentarianism (in the secular sense of the word).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dunno, A. Apparently, she handed in her walking papers - and started her own podcast show the same day. I hear speculation that she might just go the route of the political performance artist the way Candace Owens has - by making the right noises as a pundit rather than an active participant. It'd be a shame if that's the way it goes... but these days, if you are an honest person trying to do good work in public politics - the vipers and snipers in that game will tear you to shreds regardless of which side of The Great Divide you're on.

      Delete
  16. Has her behavior been consistent with being a wef trollop?
    Is she as valuable as L Graham (only more masculine?) could she be a wolf in...? Do the true loyals not have more urgent matters to be about than letting your "little guy" lead you around. The entrance gate to hell itself is only about 3 clicks away. Keep your "big" head in the game guys.

    ReplyDelete
  17. A lot of people (including me) have been through the change she's experiencing right now. I prefer to enjoy the sight of the Democratic Party hemorrhage support. Enjoy their decline, and all that.

    This is not the time to roll out purity tests. It's time to enjoy the smell of napalm in the morning.

    ReplyDelete